Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Music Converter and Music Set Theory

A couple of free apps for the weekend.

Music Converter
This is a utility which convert musical pitches, MIDI notes and frequencies.


Music set Theory
With Music set Theory software, calculate the set Theory values of a pitch set (music theory): 



Music Converter and Music set Theory at the app store:
Pierre Couprie

set Theory

Quadratic Equations 1

This post is, once again, a summary of a longer post authored by me on my own blog. My blog covers a lot of areas, including Vedic Mathematics. If you are interested in reading my thoughts on other topics, please feel free to visit my blog and post comments on the other articles you find there also! For those who read the first part of my story, I have posted the second part here. If you can provide me feedback or have other thoughts on my writing (content, style, anything at all), I would appreciate hearing from you. Thank you!

In the past several lessons, we have dealt with the solution of various types of linear equations. We started out by deriving various formul! ae to solve equations that fall into specific types using the Paravartya Yojayet sutra. We then proceeded to applications of the powerful Sunyam Samyasamuccaye sutra. We then covered various kinds of mergers, and finally we covered applications of the Anurupye Sunyam Anyat sutra to the solution of simultaneous linear equations.

In this lesson, we will deal with quadratic equations, which are polynomial equations of the second degree. What this means is that when the equation is expanded out with no fractional terms, there exists at least one term in which the unknown quantity is raised to the second power.

The general f! orm of a quadra tic equation is ax^2 + bx + c. The quadratic formula can be used to solve equations in the standard form. The quadratic formula is usually written as below:

quadratic formula
In this lesson, however, we will not deal with quadratic equations that are written in the standard form. It may take quite a bit of effort in cross-multiplication, collection of like terms, etc., to get these equations int! o the standard form. The solution of these equations using the quadratic formula, therefore, is quite cumbersome, not to mention, error-prone.

Rather than go through all that labor, we will identify these special types of equations and apply certain simple procedures to solve them quickly and easily.

The first special type of quadratic equations we will consider are like the one below:

x + 1/x = 10/3

In the traditional method, we would go through the process of getting the equation into the standard form using the steps below:

x + 1/x = 10/3 becomes
(x^2 + 1)/x = 10/3 becomes
3x^2 + 3 = 10x becomes
3x^2 - 10x + 3 = 0

We would then solve it using the quadratic formula by setting a = 3, b = -10 and c = 3. This would lead to the solutions x = 3 and x = 1/3.

However, we don't have to go through all that trouble to solve this kind! of equation. All we have to do is observe that 10/3 = 3 + 1/3! . Thus, we would immediately have figured out that we can rewrite the given equation as below:

x + 1/x = 3 + 1/3

The symmetry of the equation above immediately reveals the answers, x = 3 and x = 1/3.

The same method can be used to solve many different problems such as the examples below:

x + 1/x = 26/5 => x + 1/x = 5 + 1/5 => x = 5, 1/5
x + 1/x = 50/7 => x + 1/x = 7 + 1/7 => x = 7, 1/7
x + 1/x = -17/4 => x + 1/x = -4 - 1/4 => x = -4, -1/4

We are not restricted to x + 1/x on the left-hand side either. Consider the equation:

(2x + 3) + 1/(2x + 3) = 50/7

Since the right-hand side of the equation can be expanded to 7 + 1/7, by the symmetry of the equation, we can equate 2x + 3 to either 7 or 1/7 (or equivalently, by equating (2x + 3) and 1/(2x + 3) to 7). We then get the solutions x = 2 and x = -10/7 to the given equation.

Similarly, consider the equation:

5x/(2x + 3) + (2x! + 3)/5x = 26/5

The right-hand side of the equation can be expanded to 5 + 1/5. Thus, we can use the symmetry of the resulting equation to derive the following linear equations:

5x/(2x + 3) = 5
5x/(2x + 3) = 1/5 or alternatively, (2x + 3)/5x = 5

These two equations can then be solved to give us x = -3 or x = 23/3.

Now, consider the equation:

(x + 3)/(3x + 5) + (3x + 5)/(x + 3) = 17/4

The right-hand side of the equation can be expanded to 4 + 1/4. This then lets us solve the equation by deriving the linear equations below:

(x + 3)/(3x + 5) = 4
(x + 3)/(3x + 5) = 1/4 or alternatively, (3x + 5)/(x + 3) = 4

These equations can then be solved to give us x = -7 and x = -17/11.

Now, consider an equation of the type below:

x - 1/x = 3/2

We can rewrite the equation as below:

x - 1/x = 2 - 1/2

We may be tempted to conclude from the s! ymmetry of the equation on both sides of the equal-to sign tha! t x = 2 or x = 1/2. That would be wrong. In equations such as the above where the terms are connected by "-" signs instead of "+" signs, the solutions are x = 2 and x = -1/2. Only with x = -1/2 is it possible to get -1/x = 2, and therefore x - 1/x = 2 - 1/2. This is important to remember.

We will illustrate this with a few examples as below:

x - 1/x = 8/3 becomes
x - 1/x = 3 - 1/3, which then leads to x = 3 and x = -1/3 as the solutions.

x - 1/x = 63/8 becomes
x - 1/x = 8 - 1/8, which then leads to x = 8 and x = -1/8 as the solutions.

x - 1/x = -24/5 becomes
x - 1/x = -5 + 1/5 which then leads to x = -5 and x = 1/5 as the solutions.

The technique is equally applicable to cases where the left-hand side consists of other terms than x and 1/x. The following examples illustrate a few examples of these cases:

(3x + 2) - 1/(3x + 2) = 63/8 => (3x + 2) - 1/(3x + 2) = 8 - 1/8 =>
3x + 2 = 8, 3x + 2 = -1/8 ! => x = 2, x = -17/24
2x/(5x + 1) - (5x + 1)/2x = -15/4 => 2x/(5x + 1) - (5x + 1)/2x = 1/4 - 4 =>
2x/(5x + 1) = 1/4, 2x/(5x + 1) = -4 => x = 1/3, -2/11
(4x + 3)/(3x + 4) - (3x + 4)/(4x + 3) = 24/5 => (4x + 3)/(3x + 4) - (3x + 4)/(4x + 3) = 5 - 1/5 =>
(4x + 3)/(3x + 4) = 5, (4x + 3)/(3x + 4) = -1/5 => x = -17/11, -19/23

Sometimes, the equation may have undergone some transformations that hide its true nature. And sometimes, the right-hand side looks as if it is not really the sum or difference of reciprocals. But closer observation leads to the solution by unmasking the true nature of the equation. For some examples of these kinds of problems, please read the full lesson here.

Assuming that the left-hand side is a pair of reciprocals, connected by either "+" or "-", how do we verify whether the right-hand side can be expressed as! a pair of reciprocals with the same sign between them? We wil! l explor e this question in greater detail in the next lesson.

In the meantime, I hope you have found this lesson useful and interesting. I also hope you will apply the techniques explained in this lesson on real problems so that you become familiar not only with the technique itself (which is actually quite trivial), but also with the fractions that result either from the addition of numbers with their reciprocals, or the differences between numbers and their reciprocals. That will enable one to apply this technique where appropriate, on sight and mentally, to solve the types of quadratic equations we have dealt with in this lesson. Good luck, and happy computing!

quadratic equation

How to teach equation solving

I got this question in my mailbox recently:

I am having a problem with show my son how to work out the proportion problem and solving equation by division, like 7.y=105 64=y.8 and find the missing term for the proportion of 3/4=x/16.

Can you help me out?


Always remember this problem solving strategy: when a problem is too difficult, make another, similar, but in some way easier problem, and observe for a strategy to solve that one.

If 7 ⋅ y = 105 and 64 = y ⋅ 8 are difficult, use easier examples first. Have him solve these ones:

2 ⋅ __ = 4
5 ⋅ x = 10
2 ⋅ x = 6

and

8 = 2 ⋅ __
12 = 3 ⋅ x
9 = 3 ⋅ x

If 'x' intimidates him, you can use an empty line.

Then ask him, HOW did he solve these ones? Well, chances are, of course, that he just 'sees' the answer, or remembers his multiplication tables and gets the answer fro! m those.

But then SHOW him how division, in each case, gives us the answer too:

5 ⋅ x = 10. (We already know the answer is 2)
10 ÷ 5 gives the answer.

After going thru this, the initial problems should not be difficult. If they still do, then your son might have problems in understanding division concept and might need review in that area first.

Solving a proportion problem


One can solve the proportion 3/4 = x/16 in several different ways. This one is easy to solve thinking via fractions.

Essentially, you have two equivalent fractions: 3/4, and x/16. IF your son has difficulty solving this problem when it's written as fractions, then he should study again equivalent fractions.

Another way to solve this is to see it as an equation:(number) = x/(number)
Can he solve easier equations ! such as 5 = x/2 or 2 = x/4 ?
Again, the opposite operation will work: x is divided by a number, so when solving, you need to multiply.

Hope this helps.


Solve equivalent fractions and get practice

Swelling...again....again....again.....

Okay. I know I've written about this before, but maybe I should ask a doctor about an on and off issue I've been having. Why do my stumps (or one of them) swell every so often? At least, it's been happening again lately. How would I know if it is really my diet? For instance, if I order food, I wouldn't know how much salt is put in it. Could it be humidity? Or, could it be lack of exercise? Let me see....maybe all of the above. Whatever the cause is, it is certainly uncomfortable. It becomes difficult to stand too long just like yesterday as I was trying to get ready for work. Ahhh......

how to find the area of aquadrilateral

AP Exam Practice Quiz 1 and Intro to the Intermediate Value Theorem of Integrals

Introducing the first of a series of AP exam practice quizzes, the intermediate value theorem of integrals, the day when the AP Calculus 2008: Without Bound blog is unblocked at Daniel McIntyre Collegiate Institute, the series of YouTube videos in tandem with Flickr pics, and kristina's powerpoint presentations!


AP EXAM PRACTICE QUIZ 1


Let h b! e a function defined for all x does not equal 0 such that h(4) = -3 and the derivative of h is given by h'(x) = (x^2-2)/x for all x does not equal 0.


a) Find all values of x for which the graph of h has a horizontal tangent, and determine whether h has a local maximum, a local minimum, or neither at each of these values.

To determine if there are local extrema at the critical numbers, we must first determine the critical numbers. Remember that there are critical numbers when a function has an asymptote or is undefined. h' = 0 when x = sqrt(2) and -sqrt(2). h' is undefined at x = 0 since 0 isn't in the domain (as stated in the question). So critical numbers are x = sqrt(2), -sqrt(2), and 0.

We use the first derivative test on h' to see where h' is positive or negative. Why? Because when h' is positive, h is increasing; when h' is negative, h' is decreasing. So a change in sign in h' would indicate a slope of ze! ro at that point and that's where there are local extrema. Acc! ording t o the line analysis, we see that to the left of -sqrt(2), h' is negative; between -sqrt(2) and 0, h' is positive; between 0 and sqrt(2), h' is negative; and to the right of sqrt(2), h' is positive. Wherever h' changes sign from negative to positive, h has a local minimum; wherever h' changes sign from positive to negative, h has a local maximum. By the first derivative test (line analysis), there are local minimums at x = -sqrt(2) and x = sqrt(2). We don't look at 0 because it's not part of the domain of the function.


b) On what intervals, if any, is the graph of h concave up?

Rememberize these rules (from chapter 5 of your textbook):

If the second derivative is positive, the first derivative is increasing, and the parent function is concave up.


If the second derivative is negative, the first derivative is decreasing, and the parent function is concave down.



So wherever h" is positive, h is concave up.

We determine h" by differentiating h using the quotient rule.

We see that h" is positive, so h is concave up everywhere.


c) Write an equation for the line tangent to the graph of h at x = 4.

Pull out the point-slope formula: y-y1=m(x-x1)

The question gave us the x-coordinate: x = 4.
The question! gave us the y-coordinate: y= -3.
m is the slope at x = 4! , so plu g x = 4 into h' which spits out 7/2.

Plug those numbers into the equation. BING! BANG! BOOM! We're done part c.

y+3=(7/2)(x-4)


d) Does the line tangent to the graph of h at x = 4 lie above or below the graph of h for x > 4?

If we draw a line tangent to the graph at x = 4, the line is below the graph at x > 4, because h is concave up everywhere.


INTERMEDIATE VALUE THEOREM OF INTEGRALS



Similar to the intermediate ! (or mean) value theorem of derivatives (that in a closed interval between a and b there exists a point on a continuous function which equals the average value), there exists a point on a continuous function which equals the average integral of the function.


We have b = 3. We have a = 0. We have f(x) = 1-2x. Plug the numbers into the equation. BING! BANG! BOOM! We get the average integral. But why does it work?


< img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 361px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMJyur_sqimRoWoyFhF7L763IQ9-1sauBZeeEKWnFA7YGcITIgwIZcFLv1scAnXvQSR6hs3irI6Z5NyZceEvVAVFYpqT9FU0VoNb3tkG5TiIEB9LKZxKQR-XcxhL3yIvWi_8AHevWFspdM/s400/6.bmp" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5310238211959744338" border="0" />In this graph, pivot the yellow area found between c and b to the white area found between c and a. Notice that they fit together like a jigsaw puzzle to yield one big yellow rectangle. We can imagine that one big rectangle having the same area as the area under the graph, which we can see as the average value of the function.


HOUSEKEEPING

  • Next scribe is benofschool.
  • I'll be away on Monday to write the grade 12 English pilot exam.
  • Don't forget to check Graeme's comment on Rence's post as it will prepare you for the exam!
  • Don't forget to give Jamie your $1.25 donations so she can make her Betty Crocker style cheesec! ake!
  • Pi Approximation Day is coming! Are we organizing the annual Coin Hunt for Pi Approximation Day too?

Applications of Derivatives Practice Problems

Survivor Champions!

Congratulations to the following teams on their victory in the Survivor Challenges!

Period 1:

Numa



Period 3:

Numa



Period 4:

User Error



Period 6:

Additron



Period 7:

Inconsistent System of Matrices



Each winning team will receive a bonus to their final. Again, congrats to all the winners and to all that played. Hopefully, this review game has helped you to focus your studying and provided a little bit of fun along the way. Use some very honest self assessment to help determine what you need to spend time on while studying. Good luck on all your finals!

solve algebra 2 answers

Mixture problems - algebra 1

I am hoping you can help me. I can not remember how to solve mixture problems and how to set them up. Examples are as follows:
A merchant made a mixture of 150lb. of tea worth $109.50 by mixing tea worth $1.25 a pound with tea worth $.65 a pound. How many pounds of each kind did he use?

Organizing the information in a table or chart is usually very helpful in dealing with mixture problems. Other than that, it helps to study several examples and practice solving them yourself. After a while, it gets easier and patterns begin to emerge.

The first problem has two unknowns. Let x be the amount of more expensive tea, and y the amount of the cheaper tea (in pounds).

In our table, we will look at the amounts of tea (in pounds), price per pound, AND the a! mount the tea is worth, which is (the amount) times (the price).

amount | price per lb | worth
-------------------------------------
x | $1.25 | 1.25x
-------------------------------------
y | $0.65 | 0.65y
-------------------------------------

Then we add one more row to the table that has to do with the MIXTURE, or the total.

amount | price per lb | worth
-------------------------------------
x | $1.25 | 1.25x
-------------------------------------
y | $0.65 | 0.65y
-------------------------------------
150 lb | ?? | $109.50

Now we get our equations. First of all, x + y = 150. And secondly, 1.25x + 0.65y = 109.50.

This gives you a system of two linear equations to solve, using any standard technique. For example, you can solve from the first that y = 150 ! 722; x and substitute that into the second.

The sol! ution is : x = 20, y = 130.

Check: we have 20 lbs of tea costing $1.25 per pound, so it is worth $25.
We have 130 lbs of tea costing $0.65 per pound, so it is worth $84.50. Total worth is $109.50. It checks.



A pharmacist has 10 oz. of salt and water of which 4 oz. are salt. How may ounces of water must he add so that 5% of the new solution is salt.

This is a very typical (and routine) problem from algebra 1 textbooks. Here, our table will have one row for the original situation, and another for the final situation. We are checking the amounts of salt and water, and then the total amount.

| salt | water | total
-------------------------------------
1st situation | 4 | 6 | 10
-------------------------------------
2nd situation | 4 | ? | ?
-------------------------------------

The KEY is that there is no ! salt added, only water. Our unknown is the amount of water added.


| salt | water | total
---------------------------------------
1st situation | 4 | 6 | 10
---------------------------------------
2nd situation | 4 | 6 + x | 10 + x
---------------------------------------

The equation is gotten from the statement that 5% of the new solution is salt. This means that 5% of the total (which is 10 + x) is salt (which we know to be 4 oz).

0.05(10 + x) = 4.

0.5 + 0.05x = 4
0.05x = 3.5
x = 3.5 / 0.05 = 70.

He needs to add 70 oz of water.



In 110 lb. of an alloy of tin and copper, the amount of tin was 5lb. less than 1/3 that of the copper. How may pounds of tin were there?

Again, we organize this into a table:

| tin | copper | total
--------------------! ------------------
| t | c | 110
----------! -------- ---------------------

We have TWO unknowns: the amount of tin and the amount of copper. Right there we get one equation: t + c = 110. The statement "the amount of tin was 5lb. less than 1/3 that of the copper" allows us to build another equation relating t and c.

t = (1/3)c - 5

Again, a system of equations. Since t is expressed in terms of c in the equation above, I use that to substitute to the first equation:

(1/3)c - 5 + c = 110

(4/3)c = 115

c = 115 * 3 / 4

c = 86.25.

But it asked for t, so t is 110 - 86.25 = 23.75 lb.

I hope these examples were helpful in dealing with "mixture" type problems in algebra.


algebra 1 homework help